20 Jan 2000

Mounts for the Display of Books







Figure 1. Book support made of museum board covered in the same cloth as the case lining, during installation







Until last year, there were basically two types of supports used to display books in the V&A. They had been developed, over a number of years, in order to prevent damage being caused to books whilst open on exhibition. The first is made of museum board covered with the cloth used on the inside of a showcase (Figure 1). Although bulky, it blends in with the case. It takes about one and a half hours to make. The other type is made of PerspexTM(ICI), taking between four and eight hours to make depending on the complexity of design (Figure 2).



Both types of cradle are made to fit a particular book open at a particular page. Both give full support to the boards and joints of a volume. Both have advantages and disadvantages, in terms of time, materials and aesthetics. Neither can be reused. Experience has shown that reuse for another volume with different dimensions and different opening characteristics can cause damage to the book, negating the very purpose of making supports.



 



 



Figure 2. Perspex book support, with fore-edge lip and textblock support. Photography by V

Figure 2. Perspex book support, with fore-edge lip and textblock support









A year ago there was a 'brainstorming' session to try and design the elusive universal cradle, which would fit any book and could be reused. Conservation mounters, paper and book conservators, curators and joiners came with various designs and materials. The ideal qualities were summarised as non-damaging and inert, cheap and reusable, easy and quick to use and aesthetically acceptable. Many ideas were suggested, based on some intriguing concepts ranging from deckchairs and the Rahl (the Islamic Koran stand), to a cribbage board, to using the pliable material used in 'Flexicurves'. The idea of some sort of kit emerged, with interchangeable components which could be reused. Designs were developed between each of the next three sessions, discussed and finally discarded in favour of two ideas. Danny Norman and Simon Fleury developed the two concepts and made enough prototypes to try them out at two different displays earlier this year. The following articles present the thinking behind the designs and give accounts of progress to date.



 



I worked through the various concepts following the list of criteria that the cradle should meet. The criteria included:

1. The cradle must support all parts of the book and ensure safe display;

2. Both sides must be independently adjustable in height and the angle from the horizontal at which the book can be displayed;

3. The overall design and choice of materials must be as inert and unobtrusive as possible to fit into any style of display in the future;

4. The cradle must be reusable and durable;

5. It must be easy to use, with the minimum amount of tools necessary, to set a book up;



Figure 3. Prototype book cradle with telescopic legs. Illustrated by Danny Norman

Figure 3. Prototype book cradle with telescopic legs. Illustrated by Danny Norman









Many concepts had excellent individual qualities, but most could not reach all the above criteria. For instance, a vacuum cushion used in Ceramics Conservation to hold objects whilst being worked on had unique moulding qualities that could have worked well for supporting an open book. Unfortunately, this, like many ideas, could not be worked up into a finished design. From this point I worked systematically through each design feature that was needed to meet the above prerequisites. To make the cradle adjustable in height, I opted for telescopic tubular legs (Figure 3). These were made from steel tube and rod of differing lengths sprayed black. These legs, like all the cradle parts, would be interchangeable between cradles, ensuring a flexible system of components to meet the needs of most books. To support the book boards, I decided on 6mm polished-edge Perspex sheet with a 10mm lip on the front edge to stop the book sliding forward. This element was decided upon as it was the only part that could not be adjustable in size and had to be the exact size of the book's boards for maximum support (these components will be cut down and reused for smaller books in the future). For continuity, Perspex plates were also used for the bases of the cradle, these too were 6mm polished-edge, drilled and the legs were bolted on. To make the book cradle adjustable to any angle I decided on a ball and socket fitting between the leg and the Perspex plate. For this I used a modified camera tripod fitting; again this was removable so the parts could be interchanged depending on the size and weight of book being displayed. Because of the accuracy needed to support the book and protect the spine, the cradle was made in two parts, these could then be positioned on either side of the book's spine.



Prototype book cradle with telescopic legs. Illustrated by Danny Norman

Prototype book cradle with telescopic legs. Illustrated by Danny Norman









To set the cradle up to the correct height and angle, four card templates were cut. These templates were placed on the inside and outside edges of the cradle and the two tightening nuts adjusted. The cradle was then ready to support the book.



During installation at the Royal College of Art's Centenary Exhibition some design problems were exposed and amendments made accordingly. Firstly, because of the weight and nature of an open book, the two parts of the cradle had a tendency to slip apart. To rectify this problem in the show, two small pins were placed on the outside edges of the cradle into the base of the case. Obviously this was not ideal, so two small holes have now been drilled in the corners of the base plates and a pin secures the two cradle halves together. In addition, although the card templates used to set the cradle worked well, they took a while to use so a new, faster method for setting up is being devised at present.

37242-large.jpg

Figure 4. Prototype book cradle with slotted perspex combs and perspex wedges







The present method of cradle construction using board and cloth is fairly costly. Each cradle is made-to-measure, taking considerable time and is then discarded after use. It does however offer very good support for the book and apart from the cost of the cloth, the materials used are relatively inexpensive. When on display it is of little distraction, combining well with the cloth interiors of the display cases. Many of the available alternatives are made solely for a specific book, usually in Perspex and cannot be reused, or else they are over engineered and still not fully reusable.



I began by looking at the existing cradle and the basic requirements needed to safely support an opened book, with a view to adapting or simplifying the old method and possibly finding a less time-consuming, low-tech alternative. The task of finding a universal, fully reusable cradle seemed unrealistic.



I started building very basic models using slotted pieces of scrap card. Looking like skeletons of the board and cloth cradle these models took very little time to construct, they were quite sturdy but only offered minimal support to the book. The models and ideas were presented at the following cradle meeting and together with suggestions generated, it was decided to continue developing these prototypes.



It was apparent that the slotted base supports could be made from Perspex and be reused by matching them to the required length of the book to be displayed. The combs were fabricated from lengths of 10mm Perspex, with the slots milled at 5mm gaps and each slot 2mm wide to take museum board.



Figure 5. A book displayed on the slotted perspex support with museum board wedges







By experimenting with various ways of scoring and bending pieces of mount board to the dimensions of the books boards, it was possible to construct wedges that offered the correct support to the open book. The wedges are constructed by making two scored bends in the card, one at the spine edge and the other at the fore-edge of each of the boards of the book, taking into account the angles and dimensions for the required opening. The two board supports can then be slotted into the Perspex combs, leaving space for the spine. The supports can also be made from Perspex (Figure 4).



It was agreed to try this method on a National Art Library display. In practice, the method proved successful. The scoring and bending of the supports took minimal time and the cost of materials was low. Reservations were raised about the look of the board supports (Figure 5). It was felt that for some display situations the board could be distracting. With this in mind I approached the manufacturers of the Perspex combs to see if it was possible to make the wedge supports in Perspex. They were able to provide prototypes that slotted into the combs, supporting the book in the same way as the board models. Another possibility would be to use coloured mount board to match the interior case covering.



As an inexpensive and quick method of display this cradle works well. Using either the mount board supports or Perspex, the cradle can be adapted to varying display requirements. The main limitation on this design is in its blending-in with the overall look of the intended exhibition or display situation. With a collection of different lengths of the Perspex combs it should be possible to reuse them by matching them to the dimensions of the book.



Reference:

Conservation Journal, Issue 22, January 1997

Authors: Helen Shenton, Danny Norman, Simon Fleury.

19 Jan 2000



Paper Conservation Manual



Contents























Introduction



The Paper Conservation Manual, compiled by members of the AIC Book and Paper Specialty Group. The BPG Paper Manual was begun with funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities.



They now have an online version or wiki addition of the Paper Conservation Manual which allows for an ever expanding and changing resource for paper conservators and allied professionals. The 1994 print edition of the manual provided a starting off point for the web edition.



* Members of the Book and Paper Group are eligible to contribute to the wiki. Going forward, the wiki will provide a forum for sharing innovations, new techniques, traditions, research, and all things paper conservation. Please share what you know.



The group are seeking conservators with knowledge and expertise. Feel free to contact a member of the wiki team to learn how to become a contributor. They can also pair conservators with varying skills and interest: one with content and one with expertise in wiki markup and editing skills. Both types of individuals are needed.







Documentation and Treatment







Print Edition



A complete and unchanged copy of the print edition of the Paper Conservation Manual can be found at: Original PCC. The print edition has been preserved in its entirety as a record of all the hard work and expertise that came before us.



The Paper Conservation Catalog (PCC) was published from 1984-1994 by the AIC Book and Paper Group, with assistance from the National Endowment for the Humanities. The PCC was developed by, and for, professional conservators. While persons in related fields will benefit from being acquainted with its content, the PCC is not intended to provide step-by-step recipes for the untrained. When using chapters, readers are strongly encouraged to consult the growing body of relevant literature published since the PCC ended.



The PCC began as a volunteer, collaborative effort, in the absence of much published literature, to exchange information among paper conservators, particularly the specific techniques and insights gained through practical experience. Readers will notice that, over the years, most chapters grew in length and incorporated more bibliographic references, as the availability of other literature increased. Readers are encouraged to read the front matter for further details on the project and its participants. The AIC Book and Paper Group Publications Committee is currently working with a special task force to determine the future of the project.



When citing this facsimile, the following format is suggested:



Henry, Walter, et al. 1988. Sizing/resizing. Chap. 17 in Paper Conservation Catalog. Washington D.C.: American Institute for Conservation Book and Paper Group. http://www.conservation-wiki.com/w/index.php?title=Original_PCC (accessed 1/19/2000).

AIC Book and Paper Group Publications Committee



First Edition, 1984:



22. Humidification (1984, Draft)
25. Mending
28. Drying and Flattening
Second Edition, 1985:



3. Media Problems
20. Alkalization and Neutralization
24. Backing Removal
Third Edition , 1986:



6. Visual Examination
Alkalization and Neutralization (1986, Bibliography, Special Considerations)
This was incorporated into 20. Alkalization and Neutralization above.
Fourth Edition, 1987:



26. Filling of Losses
Fifth Edition, 1988:



17. Sizing/ Resizing
23. Consolidation/Fixing/Facing
29. Lining
40. Matting and Framing
Sixth Edition , 1989:



19. Bleaching
46. Adhesives
Seventh Edition, 1990:



4. Support Problems
10. Spot Tests
16. Washing
Eighth Edition, 1992:



13. Foxing
14. Surface Cleaning
15. Hinge, Tape and Adhesive Removal
Ninth Edition, 1994:



1. Fiber Identification (Draft)
5. Written Documentation
12. Mold/Fungi
18. Parchment Treatments pt.1 of 2, pt.2 of 2
30. Inpainting

19 Nov 1998

Protecting Our Environment



Although, clearly, we are always concerned with preserving our past heritage - at the same time we must constantly be aware of our future.  We all know that times have changed and Grenada no longer survives on its Gold-Spices (nutmeg etc) as it did in its past - nowt the new gold is tourism and information-technology.

beaches_01



Visitors to our beautiful island don't expect too much but one thing is true they dream of a fantasy island - under a constant calypso-rhythm our hills must roll with lush exotic flowers not too far from bright opal-green seas and magical crisp-white sandy beaches.  However our beaches are a living-ever-changing thing, nature reminds us of this fact frequently (remember Lenny in 1999 and Ivan in 2004).

What’s Happening To Our Beaches?



In order to manage these changes, Grenada’s beaches have been monitored since 1985 by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), together with the Fisheries Division, Lands and Surveys Division, and the Land and Water Resource Unit. The Hillsborough Secondary School and the Fisheries Division have measured Carriacou’s beaches since 1997. They measure the beach slope and width every 3 months at numerous sites around the islands.



Coast and Beach Stability is always a issue and this November 1998 the COSALC (Coast and Beach Stability in the Caribbean Islands) had a sponsored workshop in Grenada where officials of government and non-government agencies met with private entrepreneurs to discuss issues related to beach management. Topics such as sand mining, the destruction of coastal vegetation, reduction of beach access for locals and the loss of small cays were on the agenda, but participants had discussed these very issues at other such meetings. Several expressed frustration as they voiced:

‘We all know what the problems are, and we have identified a variety of solutions. But our governments do not implement these solutions. Why?’


After a period of heated exchange, this question was answered: Our environmental agenda is a long term process, but political agendas are all too often designed for the short term. Elected officials with the power to create public policy respond to pressures wielded by voters. So if we want to influence political action, we must make these environmental issues relevant — and urgent — for the general public, whose voting power can determine politicians’ choices.



As a result of this statement, the 1997 COSALC workshop on beach management turned into a brainstorming session as to how to educate the public; specifically, ‘how to get environmental messages into the living room.’



In Grenada, which has its own broadcast channel, television is clearly the best way to reach people with messages about the importance of local resource conservation and wise development. Peter Thomas, assistant director of the National Science and Technology Council, comments:

‘We’ve tried reaching the general public through radio announcements and the press, but it’s hard to compete with the visual impact of television. With TV, people watch while sitting at home eating their peanuts and popcorn, and the message gets digested along with the snacks!’


Participants considered the idea of creating 30-minute documentaries, but a consensus was soon reached in support of the proposal that:

‘Few people will sit through an entire documentary, and those that do will see it only once. It is far more effective to expose people to a short 1-5 minute clip, because it may be shown over and over again like an ad. And each time it’s viewed, the message is reinforced.’


The next step was to design a training course that would put their vision into action with the support of technical experts as well as representatives of environmental agencies and government information services. Dr. Gillian Cambers of COSALC and Sea Grant presented the group’s ideas in a proposal to UNESCO’s Coast and Small Islands unit in Paris, and the proposal was implemented through the Communications section of UNESCO in Jamaica.



Eleven professionals (nine from Grenada and one each from St. Lucia and Anguilla) participated in this two-week training course in Grenada. The course was facilitated by Christopher Laird, who runs a video production company in Trinidad and Tobago. After identifying the most important environmental problems facing Grenada and the region, participants focused on learning technical skills including video camera work, editing techniques and ways of getting ideas across without a script. As Laird stressed,

‘Don’t depend on words! Visualize how to get the message across in pictures!’


Christopher Laird demonstrating the use of a video camera to participants at the UNESCO COSALC subregional workshop in video production for broadcast and exchange, Grenada, 16-27th November, 1998.

 

 

 



Participants were then divided into three groups, including representatives of environmental agencies and experts in the fields of video technology and public broadcasting. Each group worked to create a 1-minute video. (UNESCO provided three digital video camera recorders, tripods and microphones to be used on a permanent basis in Grenada, Anguilla and St. Lucia.) During a closing ceremony two weeks later, the video clips on sand mining, beach ecology and coastal construction and vegetation were shown. Explains Dr. Gillian Cambers:

‘We focused on coastal resources, particularly beaches. But the skills learned during this training can be applied to any aspect of the environment, from forestry and fisheries to disaster preparedness.’


Participating countries are now expected to create at least two additional video shorts before April when, during a follow-up course, all such programs will be shown and critiqued. Finally, local surveys will be conducted in order to glean public opinion and the impact of the videos on attitudes and behavior. According to Crafton Isaac, biologist with Grenada’s Fisheries Division:

‘This was money well spent! It was one of the most useful, practical workshops I’ve ever attended. Now we have the tools and skills to do a far better job at public education.’


Dr. Gillian Cambers adds:

‘This training was especially important because it helped to develop links between video production people and environmentalists. As local people collaborate to implement their ideas for environmental education, there’s less dependence upon outsiders.’


Depending upon this project’s success, it may be extended to other islands. UNESCO will be seeking partners in this effort.



Gail Gilchrist of the Grenada National Science and Technology Council measures the slope of a southwestern beach, where erosion and nearby coastal construction have contributed to the loss of lush vegetation.



Here Today, Gone Tomorrow



Hurricanes wreak havoc and Grenada’s Grand Anse beach, popular among island residents and well known to our many visitors and tourists, was also severely eroded during Hurricanes Lenny and Ivan. However, luckily, sand started to come back in the weeks following the hurricane.



In Grenada, most of the west coast beaches have shown erosion, while in Carriacou, the picture is more varied. Many of the beaches show erosion along one part of the beach and accretion (or build-up) at adjacent sections, thus these figures must be treated as average trends. The tri-island state has only been impacted by one severe hurricane during the period of measurement.

Wise Practices for a Healthy Beach



The state of the beach affects everyone's lives. There are no simple or universal solutions to shoreline erosion, since there are often several factors, both human and natural, contributing to the problem at a particular beach. Each beach behaves differently, so it is advisable to find out as much information as possible about a particular beach before taking any corrective action.



It is necessary to consult the Physical Planning Unit before under- taking any action at a beach.

Some forces of change, such as hurricanes and winter swells are natural, and there is little we can do to stop them, yet there are ways we can help to slow down the rate of erosion:



  • Planning new development so that it is a ‘safe’ distance behind the beach will reduce the need for expensive sea defence measures in the future.


  • Revegetating dunes with native vegetation e.g. grasses and vines, and planting beach areas beyond the reach of storm waves with salt-resistant, deep-rooting trees, such as sea-grape. (Additional development controls are required in the fragile offshore cays).


  • Resorting to ‘hard’ engineering structures such as seawalls, revetments and bulkheads, only when there is a need to protect beachfront property from wave action. Such structures, even with careful design, result in the loss or narrowing of the beach over time.


  • Considering all other beach enhancement measures such as offshore breakwaters, groynes and beach nourishment (placing sand from the offshore zone or from an inland source on the beach) at a particular site. All such measures require careful design and environmental impact assessments, so always first consult the Physical Planning Unit.