14 Mar 2013

Strengthen Protection of Grenada's National Parks and Protected Areas







The Forestry and National Parks Department (FNPD) in the Ministry of Agriculture has collaborated with the Grenada Dove Conservation Programme (GDCP) on an initiative to further strengthen the protection of two of Grenada’s Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) – the Mt. Hartman National Park KBA and the recently cabinet approved Beausejour/Grenville Vale KBA.



These KBAs are home to the critically endangered Grenada Dove, and have received international recognition by Bird Life International as Important Bird Areas.



The Forestry Department and GDCP will be implementing several activities in these KBAs that will enable the conservation of Grenada’s ecosystems and biodiversity particularly the Grenada Dove.



Additionally, this initiative will create livelihood opportunities for neighbouring communities and assist Grenada in meeting its obligations to international conventions.



Some of the planned activities include the implementation of an awareness plan which comprises a song competition and school presentations; the erection of billboards and boundary signs at these sites and the construction of a birding trail at the Beausejour/Grenville Vale KBA.



Presently, community meetings are being held and are continuing to identify livelihood opportunities for residents and the establishment of a stakeholder management team.



Funding for this Project was received from the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and was started in November 2012 and is intended to continue until April 2014.



The Project is titled “Strengthening the Legal Protection of Mt. Hartman National Park KBA and Beausejour/Grenville Vale KBA in Grenada” and is facilitated by Ms. Bonnie Rusk, Founding Director of GDCP since 1991.







Bonnie Rusk, Director of Grenada Dove Conservation Programme and National Park Ranger Peter Plenty on a round checking and rebaiting the tracking tunnels at Mt. Hartman.

Bonnie Rusk is a Conservation Biologist who has dedicated her life to saving the critically-endangered Grenada dove.

“This is my life’s work, this is what I do. It has been all-consuming for the last 18 years,” says the 46-year-old.


Rusk, a Canadian conservation biologist, fascinated by endangered species on islands, began graduate research on the dove in 1991.



Conservation efforts, initiated largely by Rusk (in collaboration with Grenada’s Forestry and National Parks) were succeeding, with the dove’s population rising from around 90 in 1990, to 182 in 2003, when Hurricane Ivan struck in 2004. “The devastation wrought by Ivan was unbelievable, it wiped out at least a third of the dove’s population,” she says.



The dove faced another threat in 2006 when plans to build a holiday resort on one of its last remaining strongholds were unveiled.  Rusk, who lives high in the Colorado Mountains but spends up to five months a year in Grenada, mediated a solution between the interests of the dove and the developers. That resulted in international exposure.

“That made a difference,” she says. “Local people saw this was a big deal and that foreign visitors would come just to see the dove. The dove is unique to Grenada.”


Rusk’s work  includes monitoring population levels; ecological studies on the dove’s dry forest habitat; collaborating with government; community work; awareness campaigns (including television), and school education programmes. She was instrumental in the establishment of two national parks for the dove, and having a dedicated visitor centre built at the Mt Harman Estate. 2007 population estimates suggest 136 doves remain, concentrated in two pockets on the Grenadian south-west and west coasts

“The species cannot decline any further,” says Bonnie, or else extinction looms. “The key is habitat protection. Many other things will come from that but first and foremost we must protect its remaining habitat.”


• Visit www.birdlife.org or contact Bonnie Rusk at bonnie@GrenadaDove.org

21 Feb 2013

 
In 2011 the International Journal of Bahamian Studies (Vol 17, No 1) published an article about the music of the Caribbean called "From Classical to Calypso: An Interview with Bahamian Composer and Conductor Cleophas R. E. Adderley" [link] by Christine Gangelhoff, Ruebendero Gibson and Crashan Johnson. This sparked a project to discover each of the Caribbean islands world of what is now called art-music.

Introduction

Classical music has not traditionally been the domain of European musicians – although we have been led to believe that from publications, concerts, and text books. But it is not exclusively European property and was never claimed as such. This myth was perpetuated by the musicologists, who were also, not accidentally, European.

Nonetheless, the performance of music for an attentive audience who remained silent until the work was ended, is a concept rather antithetic to the purpose and function of music in many cultures, and remains so in many social environs. The preponderance of this music is improvised, or at least realised by the performer from a pre-existing source. That demands an ear and insight that is challenging and distinctive, but it does not allow for the creation of a work demanding more than momentary attention and instantaneous creation. If the musician seeks an extended form or wishes to give inner voices a more complex role, something else is needed. Polishing ideas in this manner can increase the time needed for the creation of the work. Once finished, it can be played outside of the immediate locale, its details are notated so that others may per form it, at a distance of space or time from the original creator.

When such a work is to be created in a new region, the composer may try to follow a European model, but this is dressing up one's own culture with foreign clothes. That is then the time to idealise the local impetus. In the United States, we struggled with this problem for decades, too few initially heeding the words of Antonín Dvořák when he was a visitor to New York in 1893. He had faced this situation when he tried to write music that reflected his own homeland, rather than the power of a German invasion. He urged the Americans not to follow Leipzig, but to acknowledge their distinctive roots. But these were the creation of slaves, at a time lynchings and minstrel shows were forms of popular entertainment. A few followed his advice: African Americans of course, like Harry Burleigh and William Grant Still with the spiritual and blues, and a few whose ancestry did not experience involuntary importation, George Gershwin, being the most successful.

Gradually, people outside the Caribbean had begun to learn music that was not of European origin. We owe that discovery to ethnomusicologists who alerted the musicologists to humanism and social relevancy, who subsequently infected the educators and their students, from whom came those subversives who have begun to remove myopia from the repertoires. Now we are enjoying the richness of the music of contemporary Africa and Asia. It might seem difficult to comprehend now, but there was a time when jazz could not be performed in the campus practice rooms, when no course was offered in the universities on American music. The change in the US came about with the government funds made available to commemorate the Bicentennial of the United States in 1976. And money changed philosophies. Our own sentiments of cultural inferiority began to vanish and the repertoires and course offerings were augmented. In the end, if art music is the focus of attention, that study must be informed by all idioms. All we in the United States might know now of The Bahamas and much of the Caribbean is tourism, adorned with a paternalistic attitude. So what message Dvořák offered over a century ago might relate to The Bahamas? What of the spirituals brought here by those immigrants who served the Loyalists? How has your music taken the British choral tradition as a point of departure? What dialect does your jazz speak? What of your traditional dances and your own lullabies? What of your folklore? That which is taking place now so dramatically in The Bahamas will further define classical music to the world. And herein are the means whereby these prob lems are addressed and these questions are answered.

Discoveries that are reported as a mere list of names are dead-end, providing no immediate amelioration. From this initial point, one needs to know what works these individuals have created, how to locate those that have been made available to the public, and which of these have been played or recorded. Now the work becomes functional for private collectors, libraries, and archives. Even this is not enough. The obligation now falls on those in a posit ion to disseminate the information – authors, performers, educators, and those in the media. Simultaneously, the works must be seen in the light of the culture in which they were created and which they normally are designed to enhance. By that process, others develop a concept of the distinction of this culture and the people for whom it was created. The music now becomes securely located within the humanities and the culture gains a better understanding of humanity.

Had anyone guessed there had been so many art composers, so prolific, from these countries? We knew about Christiane Eda-Pierre, the soprano born in 1932 in Martinique who captivated Parisian opera lovers; Edward Henry Margetson who migrated from St. Kitts to the United States, continuing his work in church music; baritone Willard White, born in Jamaica in 1948, who was knighted in 1995 by Queen Elizabeth II and ranks among the major artists of opera. What now of those others born in the Caribbean who enhanced not only their homeland, but also the musical life of London, New York, or Paris? This work of Dr. Gangelhoff and Ms. LeGrand now creates opportunities for those who may hope to benefit from these efforts.
Dominique-René de Lerma
Professor Emeritus, Lawrence Conservatory of Music, Lawrence University, Appleton Wisconsin


Art-Music by Caribbean Composers

by Dr. Christine Gangelhoff
Assistant Professor of Music at The College of The Bahamas since 2007 and a member of the C-Force Chamber Ensemble 

Musical genres associated with the Caribbean region typically include popular and traditional styles such as reggae, calypso, soca, merengue, and zouk. These musical styles are, in general, well documented both in the scholarly and popular realm; writings on and recordings of these styles are easy to locate. Art-music from the Caribbean region is much less examined and, indeed, less well known. Many composers of art-music have emerged from Caribbean nations, often to little notice. Research and documentation of this tradition exists but is scattered, easily overlooked and, in general, difficult to locate. The goal of this project, now in its second volume, is to identify and list all available information on the art-music tradition of the Caribbean region. It will, ultimately, form a comprehensive document of value to musicians, ethnomusicologists, historians, researchers, educators and students. We recognized a need to broaden somewhat the original scope of the project. Initially, only composers born in and native to the Caribbean were to be considered for inclusion. However, it became clear that some important composers, not born in the Caribbean but long resident there, have been influential in the art-musical tradition of certain islands. As excluding those influential composers from this project would render inaccurate its depiction of art-musical life, the authors decided to change the original restrictions. Therefore, non-native-born composers of particular importance to an island are included as is a notation of the composer's place of origin. This sec ond volume of the project provides a listing of scores and sheet music; recordings (sound files, CD's, etc.); websites; a bibliography of books and articles; and a listing of research institutions and libraries regarding composers of Caribbean art-music. Whenever possible, we included information on the potential sources of these materials (directions to where they can be acquired, either by purchase, by download, or by borrowing). We have intentionally excluded materials existing exclusively in outdated formats (such as 78 LPs, audiocassettes, and microform). We also have excluded those works for which a record exists but no copies can be located. (If an item cannot at least be borrowed from a library or purchased from a vendor, it is not included here).

Defining Art-Music


Art-music is a difficult concept to define. The distinction between art music and folk music is indeed blurred and, as a result, is difficult to articulate. For this project, we used the following criteria to distinguish art music from popular, traditional and folk music (styles which, again, are not covered here, being already well-represented elsewhere). These criteria do not arise from elitist intentions and are outlined in order to demonstrate clearly which works are included in the scope of this work:
  • Art-music descends from the western classical tradition.
  • Art-music may draw inspiration from or make use of melodies from folk music or dance tunes, as composers have done throughout history. But, while the subject matter may be borrowed from the folk or popular traditions, the style remains formal, often with advanced musical structure.
  • Art-music is fully composed. Parts are arranged and written in western staff notation. Music preserved only by oral tradition and not fixed in a written medium does not qualify. (This criterion serves to distinguish classical music of non-western traditions).
  • All parts are played as written. Interpretation, as opposed to improvisation, is the dominant focus of the performer. (Accordingly, music played from a lead sheet or a jazz chart is excluded under this definition).
  • The composition and performance or interpretation of art-music requires specialized skill and knowledge, unique to the classical style.
  • The experiential focus of art-music is on listening to the performance as opposed to physical engagement such as dancing.
Art-Music excludes the influence and continued wide use of classical European religious music in the form of Hymns, Carols and Organ music in the Caribbean religious world.

Art-Music in Grenada


Grenada is among the southernmost of the Windward Islands and its two dependencies, Carriacou and Petit Martinique (“the Grenadines”), lie between it and the even more southern island, St. Vincent (McDaniel, 1998).

Columbus landed on Grenada in 1498 and encountered a large population of Carib natives who had long resisted colonization. Europeans were not able to successfully colonize the island until the 17th century. Control of the island was passed back and forth between France and Great Britain during subsequent centuries (“Grenada,” 2001). In a final change of colonial hands, authority was eventually ceded to Great Britain. French and British influences affect Grenadian cultural traditions, as do Trinidadian influences, owing to Grenada’s proximity to and close ties with Trinidad (Bugros-McLean, 2005).

European colonists established plantations, first growing sugar, and later, nutmeg and cocoa (Kaufman, 2005). The cultivation of these latter crops earned Grenada the nickname the Spice Island (Bugros-McLean, 2005). Large numbers of African slaves helped maintain the plantation economy and, as in most Caribbean nations, the descendants of these slaves make up a large percentage of the modern population. Grenada achieved independence from Great Britain in 1974 (Kaufman, 2005).

Calypso is “the dominant popular music genre in the country” (Bugros-McLean, 2005, para. 6). At the annual Carnival, bands parade in a festive display of dance, costume, and music – steelpan in particular.

“European dances lost in Europe survive in Carriacou” (McDaniel, 1998, p. 868). The music and movements of the quadrille on Carriacou have adapted “indigenous meaning and stylistic reinterpretation” (p. 871). The island of Carriacou also continues to enjoy the traditional “string band music that had been an integral part of the local culture during the Christmas season” (Bugros-McLean, 2005, para. 10). The Parang Festival, which began in 1977, affords an annual venue for string band music in competition. The Mount Royal Progressive Youth Movement, organizers of the Parang Festival, “has become a major social and cultural institution in Carriacou” (Bugros-McLean, 2005, para. 11).

Other music festivals, such as the Big Drum in Carriacou and the Grenada Spice Jazz Festival, help preserve national cultural identity and feed the tourism industry. The Big Drum, derived from African slave traditions from the early 18th century, survives on Carriacou in spite of suppression efforts by the British colonists (Bugros-McLean, 2005).


COMPOSERS
Bertha Pitt-Bonaparte (1936- )
Richardo Keens-Douglas Louis Arnold Masanto (1938- )
John George Fletcher (1931- )

COMPOSITIONS, by composer
Masanto
Hail Grenada (1974, national anthem)
Pitt-Bonaparte
Ecce sacerdos magnus (2001)
Missa consolata (2005, revised 2012) (mass)2
   Amen
   Sanctus
    Lamb of God
    Lord guide my feet -- meditation (motet)
    Memorial acclamations
       Save us saviour of the world
       When we eat this bread
Fletcher
[see Art-Music by Caribbean Composers: Barbados]


RECORDINGS
National anthems of the world, vol. 3: Denmark
     - Grenada [CD]. (2006). Hong Kong: Marco Polo. Catalogue no. 8.225321
       Track 49. Hail Grenada (1:31)

SOUND FILES
Hail Grenada. http://www.gov.gd/our_nation/national_anthem.html

BOOKS AND ARTICLES
Miller, R. S. (2000). “The people like Melée”: The Parang festival of Carriacou, Grenada. Dissertation, (Ph.D), Brown University.
Miller, R. S. (2003.) “Me ain’ lie on nobody!” Locality, regionalism, and identity at the Parang string band competition in Carriacou, Grenada. The World of Music, 45(1), 55-77.
Miller, R. S. (2005). Performing ambivalence: The case of quadrille music and dance in Carraicou, Grenada. Ethnomusicology, 49(3), 403-440. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20174404
Miller, R. S. (2008). Carriacou string band serenade: Performing identity in the Eastern Caribbean. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. ISBN 9780819568588

Abstract

Calypso is “the dominant popular music genre in the country” (Bugros-McLean, 2005, para. 6). At the annual Carnival, bands parade in a festive display of dance, costume, and music – steel pan in particular. “European dances lost in Europe survive in Carriacou” (McDaniel, 1998, p. 868). The music and movements of the quadrille on Carriacou have adapted “indigenous meaning and stylistic reinterpretation” (p. 871). The island of Carriacou also continues the traditional “string band music that had been an integral part of the local culture during the Christmas season” (Bugros-McLean, 2005, para. 10).

References

Bugros-McLean, P. (2005). Grenada. In Continuum encyclopedia of popular music of the world: Locations and primarily sourced from Cowley, John, (1996). Carnival, Canboulay and Calypso: Traditions in the Making:- "Elements of the Trinidadian carnival, especially the calypso, have been adopted by several neighboring islands, such as Grenada, Carriacou, Dominica and St. Lucia. Steel pans have become popular in Jamaica. In other parts of the Caribbean, distinct traditions mark the festivity. In Haiti, for example, carnival is celebrated to the sound of rara bands, in which ditties containing veiled critiques are accompanied by interlocking melodies produced on bamboo trumpets (vaksin)."

Kaufman, W. (2005). Grenada. In Britain and the Americas: Culture, politics, and history. Retrieved from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/abcbramrle/grenada

McDaniel, L. (1998). Grenada. In D. A. Olsen & D. E. Sheehy (Eds.), Garland encyclopedia of world music, volume 2: South America, Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean (pp. 864-872). London, England: Routledge.

Grenada (W.I.). (2001). In The companion to British history, Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/routcbh/grenada_w_

Notes


The 2013 Bahamas International Symposium on composers of African & Afro-Caribbean descent Symposium coordinators: Dr. Christine Gangelhoff and Marlon Daniel
The 2013 Bahamas International Symposium engages musicians, composers, and scholars from all over the world in presentations, performances, and conversations around composers and performers of African and Afro-Caribbean descent. Organized around the theme Caribbean Art Music: An Unexplored Tradition. Musical genres associated with the Caribbean typically include popular and traditional styles. Although many composers of art music have emerged from Caribbean nations and from the Caribbean Diaspora, information on this subject is scarce. As composers are slowly gaining recognition, a new understanding of and visibility for Caribbean art music is emerging. The mission of this symposium is to explore this topic of regional and international interest, drawing perspectives from a wide range of disciplines.
Bertha Pitt-Bonaparte references the works of Rebecca S. Miller to make contributions to this chapter which was submitted by Dr. Christine Gangelhoff, Assistant Professor of Music at The College of The Bahamas and Member - The C-Force Chamber Ensemble,  has been a member of the music faculty of The College of The Bahamas since 2007. Previously, she served on the faculties of Memorial University of Newfoundland and St. Thomas University in St. Paul, Minnesota. She holds degrees from Yale University, the University of Minnesota, and the University of North Texas. As a flautist Dr. Gangelhoff has established her career through solo and chamber performances in the United States, Canada, the Caribbean, and Europe. As an orchestral player, she has performed with the Minnesota Orchestra, St. Paul Chamber Orchestra, Oregon Symphony, Portland Ballet, and the Vancouver Island Symphony.
In addition to performing, Dr. Gangelhoff has done extensive research on art music from the Caribbean region. The first volume of her bibliography on Caribbean art music received The College of The Bahamas Stanley Wilson award for Excellence in Research in 2012. She continues to work on subsequent volumes as she seeks to promote a deeper understanding of and greater visibility for this little-known tradition.

Rebecca (Becky) S. Miller, associate professor of music, received an A.B. from Bryn Mawr College, an M.A. from Wesleyan University and a Ph.D. from Brown University in ethnomusicology. She conducted dissertation research as a Fulbright Fellow on the Caribbean island of Carriacou (Grenada). Professor Miller's book, Carriacou String Band Serenade: Performing Identity in the Eastern Caribbean (Wesleyan University Press, 2008) examines social and political change through the performance of traditional music, song, and dance in Carriacou.

3 Jan 2013

Learning by doing in digital preservation

DigitalPreservation



Digital preservation combines policies, strategies and actions to ensure access to reformatted and born digital content regardless of the challenges of media failure and technological change. The goal of digital preservation is the accurate rendering of authenticated content over time. (Source: American Library Association)



The process of maintaining, in a condition suitable for use, materials produced in digital formats, including preservation of the bit stream and the continued ability to render or display the content represented by the bit stream. The task is compounded by the fact that some digital storage media deteriorate quickly ("bit rot"), and the digital object is inextricably entwined with its access environment (software and hardware), which is evolving in a continuous cycle of innovation and obsolescence. Also refers to the practice of digitizing materials originally produced in nondigital formats (print, film, etc.) to prevent permanent loss due to deterioration of the physical medium. Click here to learn about the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program, a collaborative initiative of the Library of Congress. The Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) was established in 2001 to address the challenges of preserving digital resources in the UK. Synonymous with e-preservation and electronic preservation. (Source: Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science)



Libraries, archives and museums have been extremely successful in preserving centuries old paper-based, cultural and scientific heritage. How well are they doing with the growing and rapidly ageing digital-based heritage?



This question has been haunting us (the digital preservation community) for a while now, even though the digital era has only just begun. We are still unsure about so many things: Are we keeping the right information? Should we be more selective? What is the right preservation strategy: safeguarding the original containers and carriers, transferring the data to long-lasting media, emulating the hardware before it becomes obsolete? Which metadata should we record? Et cetera.



At iPRES 2012, keynote speaker Steve Knight set the tone by observing that ”we are still asking the same questions as 10 years ago” and not making much progress. Paul Wheatly pointed to the duplication of effort in research projects and tool-building, and called it “a big fail”.



The conference proceedings do not reflect this discussion - they are a compilation of the papers that were accepted by the Scientific Program Committee – but you will find blogs and tweets that have captured the mood and voices of the participants. The concerns in the community are very real and deserve attention. In a series of blogs, I will attempt to address these concerns and to foster the informal conversation about the way forward.



Benchmarking



The concerns voiced at iPRES can be listed as follows: the gap between research and practice is too large; we need to move away from short-term project funding and move towards long-term investments; we start lots of initiatives and most of them do the same: there is too much duplication of effort for such a niche area and there is a lot of waste; we need to align ourselves and work together to achieve enough scale and to make the work more cost-effective. How do we know we are heading in the right direction? How can we measure progress? What are our benchmarks?  How well do I perform in comparison with other digital archives and repositories? Et cetera. The many methods and tools developed over the past 10 years, for the audit, assessment and certification of “trusted digital repositories” are evidence of such concerns. Just tally the occurrence of the words “risk”, “standard” and “certification” in recent conference proceedings on digital preservation: you will be overwhelmed! And the sheer number of surveys carried out to determine the state of preservation practices is astonishing. Everyone is talking about benchmarking and how to become a trustworthy repository, but benchmarking is neither a goal in itself nor a research question.



Let us take a step back and try to understand better what it is we are trying to do.



How did we do it in the paper era?



For centuries, we have assured the preservation of books, journals, newspapers, music sheets, maps and many more paper-based containers of information. To this day, we are able to provide access to most of these materials and the information therein is still mostly human-readable. This is a Herculean achievement that has been possible only thanks to a continuous and dedicated process of learning and improvement over centuries. This was neither a scientific process nor a standard-setting process. Organizations that have proven to be trusted keepers of the paper-based heritage have done so on the basis of grass-root practices that have matured over hundreds of years. Today, these good practices are woven into the fabric of the memory institutions. The setting of standards did not have a play in this evolutionary development. Preservation standards and regulations appeared only very recently and in most countries, they have not (yet) been enforced. In the Netherlands, for example, the regulation of storage conditions in public archives was set as recently as 2002, but before that, most public archives already adhered to the requirements. Research into the degradation and embrittlement of paper only started in the 1930’s. It has made impactful progress in the past decades and is still ongoing, but it is a background process at library preservation programs.



What are we doing different now?



In digital preservation, most effort has been focused on research, modeling, risk assessment and standardization. This seems to indicate that we are proceeding in a different order: research is leading and applied to the design and engineering of processes and systems. Research informs the standard-setting process, the results of which are then put into practice on the ground. The way in which the OAIS-model has evolved from a reference framework (2002) into a recommended practice (2012) that underpins most audit and certification approaches to digital preservation, illustrates this very well. In contrast to the bottom-up development of good practices in the paper era, we are now trying to standardize “best practices” that have been developed by research, in a top-down fashion , very much along the principles of scientific management developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856 -1915). In this order of things, there is very little room for feed-back from practitioners on the ground and for learning by doing.



Learning by doing and the importance of failure



In quality management circles, it is widely accepted that the top-down approach does not work - not on the long-run and not for complex and ICT-dense systems. Henry Mintzberg (1939 -), who was critical of Taylor’s method, argued that effective managing requires some balanced combination of art (visioning), craft (venturing) and science (planning). This balance can only be achieved after years of experience and learning on the job.







Mintzberg’s managerial style triangle



Research cannot solve all the problems in advance. It was Joseph Moses Juran (1904 – 2008) who championed the importance of the learning process and who added the human dimension to quality management. Practitioners are part of the learning process: they have the skills sets and the work experience that can contribute to increased knowledge and improved workflows. Failure is also part of the learning process. Organizations should deal positively with failure because it leads to improvement. Worker’s participation in the continuous improvement of work processes was taken forward by Masaaki Imai (1930 - ) in his concept of “Kaizen”.  William Edwards Deming (1900 – 1993) finally helped to popularize the concept of quality cycles, which is most commonly known as PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act). The notion that continuous improvement moves in repetitive cycles (also called iterations) was introduced some 20 years ago, in the software development industry – with the RUP process, Extreme Programming and various agile software development frameworks.



It is clear that digital preservation-as-a-process, evolving in an ICT-dense context, would benefit greatly from adopting the quality management approach of continuous improvement. In this approach the practitioners are driving the learning process and research is facilitating. OPF’s philosophy is based on this approach. OPF Hackathons bring together practitioners and researchers and aim to move the practice of digital preservation forward through “learning by doing together”.



There is a culture shift necessary in preserving institutions to more pragmatic, interactive methods of development. The open-source Archivematica project employs the agile development method in order to benefit from the community-wide experience of learning by doing and getting feedback early and often to make the suite of software better. One of the biggest challenges we face is helping preserving institutions understand their own role in finding digital preservation solutions. Fortunately, many libraries and archives have been at least administratively attached to collaborative efforts for a long time, so we hope to inspire them to participate in this kind of next-level, active, "getting-your-hands-dirty" type of collaboration.



They are actually Digital Age incarnations of Quality Circles and PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act).  Some of the pending challenges that I will focus on in future blogs are issues around Human Resources, Developing and sustaining competences and what collaboration can do for the community. The development process is important and a good methodology is crucial for quality of output. The main condition to make digital preservation a success is to have the right staff employed in a permanent role and not as project funded temporary employees. The first will enable deployment and maintenance of these fine developed technologies and practices, the latter will contribute to another perceived stand-still in development as indicated by Steve Knight. This is not a cultural shift on development practices and far more an organisational and HR challenge.



The move from research to production as many obstacles however. One is the fear of leaping into this new area without a thorough understanding of this emerging domain. Another is moving forward with research-grade software without a large team of developers to back you up. Also, there is the fear that the infrastructure costs are too large up front and require specialist skills that an archiving function may not have.



A solution to these is use of commercial systems rather than the open source / freeware that is relevant to the research domain. We provide this on your servers or on the cloud as you prefer whilst still encouraging the integration of research ideas from the good work that is done by researchers including OPF. See www.digital-preservation.com for more.

Digital preservation video training course





  1. Introduction to Digital Preservation, David Giaretta: Part 1 - Part 2


  2. OAIS Model and Representation Information, Carlo Meghini: Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3


  3. Preservation Analysis Workflow and Preservation Descriptive Information, Esther Conway: Part 1 - Part 2


  4. Digital Preservation Preparation and Requirements, Hans Hofman: Listen


  5. File Formats, Significant Properties, Manfred Thaller: Part 1 - Part 2


  6. Preservation Metadata, Angela Dappert:

    Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5


  7. Preservation planning including PLATO, Christoph Becker: Listen


  8. Preservation infrastructure, Luigi Briguglio: Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4


  9. Trusted Repositories, Stefan Strathmann: Listen


  10. Present and discuss exercises from Monday session on Preservation Descriptive Information, Esther Conway: Part 1 - Part 2